The Financial Planning Coalition issued the following statement regarding Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Mary Jo White’s announcement at the SIFMA Compliance and Legal Society Annual Seminar that she personally believes that the SEC should implement a uniform fiduciary duty for broker-dealers and investment advisers.
“We applaud Chair White for her view that a fiduciary rulemaking to protect investors is long overdue. American investors have suffered for too long from advice that is not necessarily in their best interest. Even as the Department of Labor (DOL) advances a separate fiduciary proposal for retirement assets, the SEC should now boldly move forward with its own rulemaking to close the harmful gap between advice provided by investment advisers under a fiduciary standard and the merely ‘suitable’ advice currently allowed by broker-dealers.
“It has been nearly five years since Congress authorized the SEC to adopt a uniform fiduciary standard under the Dodd-Frank Act, and four years since SEC staff recommended the adoption of a fiduciary standard that is ‘no less stringent than currently applied to investment advisers under the [Investment] Advisers Act [of 1940].’ We again urge the SEC to move forward thoughtfully and promptly to propose a rule that is consistent with this recommendation. American investors deserve advice that is in their best interest.”
Financial Planning Coalition research shows that American consumers want greater investor protection, including through the adoption of a fiduciary standard. In response to a 2013 survey, 93 percent of respondents said that they agree with the statement that financial advisers “should put your interests ahead of theirs and should have to tell you upfront about any conflicts of interest that potentially could influence that advice” – the very definition of the fiduciary standard.
The Financial Planning Coalition issued the following statement after a letter from the Chairmen of the House and Senate Appropriations Subcommittees on Financial Services and General Government was sent to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Shaun Donovan, expressing concerns over the Department of Labor’s (DOL) fiduciary rule proposal:
“We continue to urge the OMB to thoroughly and swiftly review the DOL’s proposed fiduciary rule and to resist any attempts by policymakers and industry participants to halt or delay this process based on mere presumptions about a yet-to-be-released rule. Premature attempts to keep the DOL’s proposed update of a 40 year-old rule from being subject to public review and comment should be opposed. While the Coalition cannot support the substance of a rule it has not seen any more than opponents can condemn it, we support an open and transparent process, a position anyone concerned about the security of Americans’ retirement savings should hold. We look forward to reviewing the rule when it is released for public review and comment by all stakeholders.”
The Financial Planning Coalition issued the following statement after Rep. Ann Wagner’s (R-MO) reintroduction of legislation that would delay, or even prevent the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Department of Labor (DOL) from developing fiduciary rules crucial to investor protection:
“Rep. Wagner’s legislation, the Retail Investor Protection Act, is an investor protection bill in name only. The Financial Planning Coalition helped prevent this legislation from becoming law when it was first introduced and continues to oppose it now and in the future. This bill, if enacted, would leave American investors vulnerable to potential abuses and would substantially impede or even prevent the SEC from proceeding with Congressionally authorized fiduciary rulemaking. All investors deserve to receive investment advice that is based on their best interests, and this legislation would require the Commission to consider less adequate and less effective alternatives. The bill would also slow or effectively prohibit the DOL from proceeding with its proposed fiduciary rulemaking for financial professionals who provide investment advice to retirement savers. This cynical attempt to undermine these critical investor protection efforts should be opposed.”
The Financial Planning Coalition issued the following statement regarding the White House’s announcement that the Department of Labor’s (DOL) long-anticipated proposed rule to amend the definition of “fiduciary” under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) has been sent to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review:
“Today’s White House announcement in support of the Department of Labor’s fiduciary rule proposal is a strong sign that investor protection is a priority for this Administration. Given the significant changes to retirement saving since the passage of ERISA, it is entirely appropriate for the DOL to reevaluate the 40 year-old rule defining the fiduciary standard for those financial professionals providing investment advice to retirement savers. We look forward to reviewing the department’s proposal, and urge OMB to complete its review of the rule in a timely fashion. Saving for a decent retirement is a fundamental part of life for every American. Those who work hard and save for the future deserve financial professionals whose primary concern is the best interests of their clients and not their bottom line.”
The Financial Planning Coalition issued the following statement regarding President Obama’s FY 2016 budget proposal:
“The Financial Planning Coalition is pleased that President Obama addresses the current and persistent underfunding of the SEC in his 2016 budget proposal, once again requesting $1.7 billion. While Congress modestly increased the SEC’s budget for 2015, the agency’s funding remains woefully inadequate, impeding its oversight and examination of investment advisers. We urge lawmakers to support greater investor protection by adequately funding the SEC.”
The Financial Planning Coalition issued the following statement regarding the letter from House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX)and Rep. Scott Garrett (R-NJ), chairman of the committee’s capital markets subcommittee, to Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Chair Mary Jo White regarding the costs of proposed user fees to increase investment advisor oversight:
“While we are pleased that Chairmen Hensarling and Garrett recognize there is a problem resulting from the lack of investment advisor examinations, we strongly disagree that merely asking the SEC to reallocate its stretched and inadequate resources or outsourcing examinations to third parties is the solution. Chairmen Hensarling and Garrett’s recent letter opposing user fees ignores a well-documented Boston Consulting Group economic analysis that shows that user fees are the most cost-effective solution to increasing examinations. Current legislation authorizing the SEC to assess user fees is supported by the very industry it would affect, has no impact on the American taxpayer and is scalable to address any small business concerns.
“In Washington there is a tendency to make complex what should be simple. The simplest and most cost-effective solution that will in fact protect investors is to enable the SEC – the expert agency on advisor regulations – to increase examinations with very strong support of advisors and at no cost to taxpayers. We will continue to work to encourage the 114th Congress to embrace the user fee solution.”